New York State Court of Claims

New York State Court of Claims
EDWARDS v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, # 2010-016-049, Claim No. 113158, Motion No. M-78174


Case information

UID: 2010-016-049
Claimant short name: EDWARDS
Footnote (claimant name) :
Footnote (defendant name) :
Third-party claimant(s):
Third-party defendant(s):
Claim number(s): 113158
Motion number(s): M-78174
Cross-motion number(s):
Judge: Alan C. Marin
Claimant's attorney: O'Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle & Oleson
No Appearance
Defendant's attorney: Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General
By: John M. Hunter, Esq., AAG
Third-party defendant's attorney:
Signature date: July 26, 2010
City: New York
Official citation:
Appellate results:
See also (multicaptioned case)


In this claim, which was filed and served on January 3, 2007, it is alleged that Roxanne Edwards, a patient at Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, was assaulted several times by other patients at the facility in October of 2006. The State's answer, which was filed on February 9, 2007, contains a counterclaim seeking the sum of $164,710.04 for services provided to claimant while a patient at Kinsgboro and Pilgrim Psychiatric Centers through December 31, 2006. Defendant now seeks to amend its answer to include an additional $792,611.37 for services rendered since that date through December 31, 2009, for a total counterclaim of $957,321.41.

Leave to amend pleadings is freely given; there is an appropriate basis for the amendment under 43.03 of the Mental Hygiene Law; the subject of the amendment is not jurisdictional for the purposes of the Court of Claims Act; and claimant does not oppose the motion. See, e.g., Lynch v State of New York, Ct Cl, May 29, 2008 (unreported, claim no. 113645, motion no. M-74759, UID #2008-030-526(1) , Scuccimarra, J.); Brahinsky v State of New York, Ct Cl, June 28, 2002 (claim no. 102555, motion nos. M-64576 and CM-64834, UID #2002-016-069, Marin, J.).

In view of the foregoing, having considered the submissions(2) , IT IS ORDERED that motion no. M-78174 be granted and that defendant shall serve and file its amended answer within thirty (30) days of the filing of this decision and order.

July 26, 2010

New York, New York

Alan C. Marin

Judge of the Court of Claims

1. This and other decisions of the Court of Claims may be found on the Court's website:

2. The Court reviewed defendant's notice of motion with affirmation in support and exhibits A through D.