New York State Court of Claims

New York State Court of Claims

BAIONE v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, #2004-033-524, Claim No. 106421


Synopsis



Case Information

UID:
2004-033-524
Claimant(s):
MICHAEL BAIONE
Claimant short name:
BAIONE
Footnote (claimant name) :

Defendant(s):
THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Footnote (defendant name) :

Third-party claimant(s):

Third-party defendant(s):

Claim number(s):
106421
Motion number(s):

Cross-motion number(s):

Judge:
JAMES J. LACK
Claimant's attorney:
Joseph C. Andruzzi, Esq.
Defendant's attorney:
Eliot Spitzer, New York State Attorney GeneralBy: Bridget E. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General
Third-party defendant's attorney:

Signature date:
June 9, 2004
City:
Hauppauge
Comments:

Official citation:

Appellate results:

See also (multicaptioned case)



Decision
The Court has reviewed the transcript of Kerry A. Cronin, M.D. at the request of the parties. The transcript is from a deposition of the witness on February 9, 2004. The parties marked certain objections for rulings and the Court has decided the rulings in the following manner:[1]
• abp. 14 - the objection is sustained;
• abp. 29 - the objection is overruled;
• abp. 37 - the objection is sustained;
• abpp. 49 - 50 - the objection is sustained;
• abpp. 67 -68 - the objection is sustained;
• abp. 71 - the objection is sustained; and
• abp. 79 - the objection is sustained.
Claimant shall notify defendant if he intends to continue with the deposition of this witness pursuant to the Court's rulings on the noted objections, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Order. After notification, the parties shall schedule a mutually convenient date for the continued deposition.


June 9, 2004
Hauppauge, New York

HON. JAMES J. LACK
Judge of the Court of Claims




[1]The Court will refer to the page of the transcript which holds the objection of the party as well as the arguments by counsel and then give its ruling as to the objection.