New York State Court of Claims

New York State Court of Claims

FORSHEY v. STATE OF NEW YORK, #2003-005-504, Claim No. 105817, Motion No. M-66302


Synopsis


Claimant's motion for an order compelling discovery is denied as moot.

Case Information

UID:
2003-005-504
Claimant(s):
STEVEN C. FORSHEY
Claimant short name:
FORSHEY
Footnote (claimant name) :

Defendant(s):
STATE OF NEW YORK
Footnote (defendant name) :

Third-party claimant(s):

Third-party defendant(s):

Claim number(s):
105817
Motion number(s):
M-66302
Cross-motion number(s):

Judge:
DONALD J. CORBETT, JR.
Claimant's attorney:
Steven C. Forshey,Pro Se
Defendant's attorney:
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney GeneralBy: Timothy P. Mulvey, Assistant Attorney General
Third-party defendant's attorney:

Signature date:
April 3, 2003
City:
Rochester
Comments:

Official citation:

Appellate results:

See also (multicaptioned case)



Decision


On February 19, 2003, the following papers, numbered 1 to 5, were read on motion by Claimant for an order compelling an answer to Claimant's demand for discovery:

1, 2, 3 Notice of Motion and Affidavit, Affirmation and Exhibits Annexed
  1. Opposing Affirmation
  2. Filed Papers: Claim
Upon the foregoing papers, this motion is denied as moot.

Claimant sought to compel the Defendant to answer Claimant's Discovery Demand. On January 29, 2003, the Defendant affirms that it responded to said demand.

The motion therefore is denied as moot.


April 3, 2003
Rochester, New York

HON. DONALD J. CORBETT, JR.
Judge of the Court of Claims