New York State Court of Claims

New York State Court of Claims

SCOTT v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, GREAT MEADOW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY INMATE CLAIMS DEPARTMENT; INMATE ACCOUNT DEPARTMENT; DRAFT BASEMENT SUPERVISOR; OFFICER CICERO; and INMATE GRIEVANCE DEPARTMENT MS. REAMS, #2002-011-598, Claim No. NONE, Motion Nos. M-65327, CM-65787


Synopsis


Claimant's affidavit is incomprehensible with respect to the nature of the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Case Information

UID:
2002-011-598
Claimant(s):
ALLEN ROGERS SCOTT
Claimant short name:
SCOTT
Footnote (claimant name) :

Defendant(s):
THE STATE OF NEW YORK, GREAT MEADOW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY INMATE CLAIMS DEPARTMENT; INMATE ACCOUNT DEPARTMENT; DRAFT BASEMENT SUPERVISOR; OFFICER CICERO; and INMATE GRIEVANCE DEPARTMENT MS. REAMS
Footnote (defendant name) :

Third-party claimant(s):

Third-party defendant(s):

Claim number(s):
NONE
Motion number(s):
M-65327
Cross-motion number(s):
CM-65787
Judge:
THOMAS J. McNAMARA
Claimant's attorney:
Allen Rogers Scott, Pro Se
Defendant's attorney:
Honorable Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General
By: Belinda A. Wagner, Esq.,Assistant Attorney General
Third-party defendant's attorney:

Signature date:
October 25, 2002
City:
Saratoga Springs
Comments:

Official citation:

Appellate results:

See also (multicaptioned case)



Decision


The affidavit submitted by claimant in support of this application is incomprehensible with

respect to the nature of the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion is denied.

The cross-motion by defendant for sanctions is also denied.


October 25, 2002
Saratoga Springs, New York

HON. THOMAS J. MCNAMARA
Judge of the Court of Claims


Papers Submitted:

1. Notice of Motion and unsworn affidavit dated May 24, 2002
2. Affirmation in Opposition of Belinda A. Wagner, Esq. dated July 10, 2002 with exhibits annexed
3. Responding papers of Allen Rogers Scott verified on the 5th day of August, 2002
4. Notice of Cross-Motion dated September 11, 2002
5. Affirmation in Support of Belinda A. Wagner, Esq. dated September 11, 2002 with exhibits annexed
6. Letter in Opposition of Allen Rogers Scott verified on the 3rd day of September, 2002
6. Further responding papers of Allen Rogers Scott verified on the 24th day of September, 2002