New York State Court of Claims

New York State Court of Claims

HALL v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, #2000-016-096, Claim No. 100897, Motion No. M-62435


Synopsis


Pro se claimant's second renewal motion re dismissal of his parole revocation-based claim was denied.

Case Information

UID:
2000-016-096
Claimant(s):
RALPH HALL
Claimant short name:
HALL
Footnote (claimant name) :

Defendant(s):
THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Footnote (defendant name) :

Third-party claimant(s):

Third-party defendant(s):

Claim number(s):
100897
Motion number(s):
M-62435
Cross-motion number(s):

Judge:
Alan C. Marin
Claimant's attorney:
Ralph Hall
Defendant's attorney:
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney GeneralBy: Susan J. Pogoda, AAG
Third-party defendant's attorney:

Signature date:
November 14, 2000
City:
New York
Comments:

Official citation:

Appellate results:

See also (multicaptioned case)



Decision

The action of pro se claimant Ralph Hall was previously dismissed in an order filed on March 15, 2000. The claim arose from the revocation of Hall's parole. This is his second motion to renew pursuant to CPLR 2221(e) on the ground that a federal habeas corpus action has been decided in his favor. As stated in this Court's order on Hall's previous renewal motion, even if the habeas corpus action was decided in his favor, he is not entitled to seek money damages in this Court. See this Court's order on motion no. M-61748, dated July 31, 2000 and filed August 3, 2000.

For the foregoing reasons, having reviewed the parties' submissions,[1] IT IS ORDERED that motion no. M-62435 is denied.



November 14, 2000
New York, New York

HON. ALAN C. MARIN
Judge of the Court of Claims




  1. [1]Along with the pleadings, the following were reviewed: claimant's notice of motion with "Affirmation in Support of Notice and Motion for Leave to Renew" with undesignated Exhibits; and defendant's affirmation in opposition with Exhibit A.