New York State Court of Claims

New York State Court of Claims

PUGLIESE v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, #2000-005-510, Claim No. 99992, Motion No. M-60685


Synopsis


Claimant's motion to compel is denied as moot. Defendant responded to said demands.

Case Information

UID:
2000-005-510
Claimant(s):
CHARLES PUGLIESE
Claimant short name:
PUGLIESE
Footnote (claimant name) :

Defendant(s):
THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Footnote (defendant name) :

Third-party claimant(s):

Third-party defendant(s):

Claim number(s):
99992
Motion number(s):
M-60685
Cross-motion number(s):

Judge:
Donald J. Corbett, Jr.
Claimant's attorney:
Charles PugliesePro Se
Defendant's attorney:
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney GeneralBy: Carla Rutigliano, Assistant Attorney General
Third-party defendant's attorney:

Signature date:
May 22, 2000
City:
Rochester
Comments:

Official citation:

Appellate results:

See also (multicaptioned case)



Decision

The following papers, numbered 1 to 5, were read on motion by Claimant for an order compelling production of certain documents:
Papers Numbered
Notice of Motion, Affidavit and Exhibit Annexed 1, 2

Opposing Affirmation 3

Letter from Claimant dated December 4, 1999 4

Filed Papers: Claim 5

Upon the foregoing papers, this motion is denied as moot.

Claimant seeks to compel production of certain documents as contained in a demand from May 13, 1999 (as part of an earlier attempt to file a motion) and a June 28, 1999 letter purportedly demonstrating his good faith attempt to resolve the dispute.

The Defendant advises that its responses to said discovery demands were served on October 28, 1999 and thus asserts that the motion herein is moot.

In his letter, Claimant asked that this decision be held in abeyance as not all of the demands

were met. Regardless, the sufficiency or adequacy of the responses would have to be considered in another motion, not the one currently before me.

The motion is denied as moot.


May 22, 2000
Rochester, New York

HON. DONALD J. CORBETT, JR.
Judge of the Court of Claims